• Four persons had been accessed SIT WEB site less than 5 times, one up to 10 and one more than 10 times (quest. No. 2).

• Page speed was slow in one case, fast in three and very fast in two (quest. No.3). Comments: (varies)

• Reliability of the WEB server was marked as good in 5 cases and excellent in one (quest. No.4). Comments: (better than old one)

• Page graphics was marked good in 4 and very good in two cases (quest. No. 5). (the Map)

• Ease of use was marked good in 4 and very good in two cases (quest. No. 6).

• The content was marked good in 5 and very good in one case (quest.No. 7).

• Usefulness of the Web was marked good in 4 and very good in two cases (quest. No. 8).

• Ranking the tags (where one is the lowest mark:

                 - News : one mark 1, two marks 3, one mark 4 and two marks 5 (quest.No. 10).

                - What is SIT?: one mark 1, three marks each 4 and 5 (quest. No. 10).

                - Where is SIT?: one mark 1 and four marks 5 (quest. No. 11).

                - Who is SIT?: two marks each for 4 and 5 (quest. No. 12).

                - Bibliography: one mark 4 and four marks 5 (quest. No. 13).

                - Other sites: four marks 5 (quest. No. 14).

                - Contributions: three marks 5 (quest. No. 15).

                - Guest book: one mark 2 and three marks 4 (quest. No. 16).
 

• Regarding  the content currency, one fair and four yes (quest. No. 17).

• Existence of the SIT Web page: six affirmative (quest. No. 18).

Comments about the contents were:

• to add press release on Dubrovnik,
• abstracts of SIT 2000
• references relevant to SIT 2001
• a research page (related topics)
• activist's page (intervention, peace making, resilience building)
• clarification of goals
• current theoretical framework definition

• presenting the "Forum Europa"
• connecting with SIT, Inc. web site (not yet existed)
• information sending
• scanning bibliography titles

• only one fourth or fifth of SIT members (20 – 25%) are visiting the SIT Web page. (probably depends on Internet access, Web content, ocasions)
• web's technical elements are marked with good and very good marks.
• web's contents are marked very good and excellent
• many good and constructive suggestions were given for improving the Web content.
• everyone wants the SIT Web to proceed with it's existence.

Many thanks to all that had answered the questionnaire.

Miodrag Dadasovic

Skopje, October, 2000